March 02, 2015 by
The singularity wants to merge AI with humanity. Patrick Stewart as Jean Luc Picard in Star Trek Next Generation as a borg.
The singularity is an expression coined by mathematician John Von Neuman in 1958 describing the “ever accelerating progress of technology and changes in the mode of human life”. Ray Kurzweil believes this means that artificial intelligence (AI) of computers will reach a point that the human mind and personality can be programmed completely within it to such a point that a person can have immortality living within a machine. The Borg of Star Trek the Next Generation fantasized this to such a point that people lost their individuality as they became part of the collective consciousness of the Borg machinery.
As I understand Kursweil’s dream, he wants to translate his mind and life into a computer program that would then allow him to live forever in a machine. I am trying to understand this both from a secular point of view and a Christian point of view. From a secular point of view the physics law of entropy is ignored. Everything is in a state of decay. Machines rust out and break down all the time. This dream of his presumes on a perpetual ability to repair and maintain the machinery of his Borg existence. Continue reading “Christianity and the Singularity” »
February 15, 2015 by
Where is the moral conscience of the Church today?
When I was a youth the Vietnam War was winding down. When I was of draft age, Nixon had begun the lottery and my number was too high, so I never went. But I remember that many had either fled to Canada or had filed CO, Conscientious Objector. That was a strange concept to me since I did not come to Christ until I was an adult of 32. The C.O. is a basic right of American freedom that had been used by men of faith who refused to violate the teachings of Jesus Christ in harming others.
Since the Vietnam war we have had a multitude of military police actions and wars around the world: Grenada and Panama in 1989; Desert Shield in 1990 then Desert Storm in 1991; Somalia in 1993; Bosnia mid 1990’s; Afghanistan 2001 and on; and Iraq 2003 and on – all called police actions, not wars; World War II being the last war declared by congress.
I grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area and observed the Vietnam War protests and the emergence of alternative lifestyles of Berkeley, California. The influence of that era had a stronghold on me that I was unaware. As a new believer in 1985 a friend made it her mission to get me to vote and be patriotic. Her mission was supported by worship music and preaching in the pulpit, so as a new ignorant believer I assumed that she was acting on behalf of the Lord.
During that time I joined the ranks of Christians who believed that supporting the government was patriotic and what “good” Christians do. I discovered that many Christians were police officers who attended my various congregations, many were combat veterans, many were government officials. In short people of the church populate every aspect of the government and the military and are the biggest supporters of the military. Yet, it has not always been so. Many American Christians at one time refused military service. Continue reading “Whatever Happened to Conscientious Objection?” »
December 21, 2014 by
Children’s book written by Dr. Katherine Albrecht
I am a great fan of Dr. Katherine Albrecht. I listen to her podcast daily. I listen to her through the Genesis Communications Network, although I listen to nothing else on their network. The reason I listen is because she has cutting edge information on the technology being set up as the infrastructure of the mark of the beast. She is an honest believer in Christ who has been actively resisting the surveillance inroads throughout our society and world wide. People all over the world — Christian and non-Christian alike — sense that we are fast approaching the end of the age. What is discouraging, however, is that the Church has dropped their guard and vigilance regarding the end times. It is our responsibility to be a light on the hill and warn the world of the times we are in. Continue reading “I Won’t Take the Mark” »
November 07, 2014 by
1937 book showing how 60 main families with 90 secondary families control America.
For the last 3 months I have read and converted Ferdinand Lundberg’s book, “America’s 60 Families” into a PDF e-book. I found an online copy that had been scanned which contained multiple errors, specifically in scanning the tables. To remedy these problems I purchased the book and went through page by page to make the corrections. The project is now done and available for public reading.
Since the text is in a document format, pages have been marked “[book page #]” to correspond to the printed book pages. This should facilitate quoting and referencing those quotes. It also keeps the index accurate. The only editorial difference is that I did not break up paragraphs by the book page. Thus the reference could be half a paragraph off. I also eliminated the endnotes and moved them to footnotes for reading convenience. His footnotes marked by an * (asterisk) have been left intact.
Why Should Christians Read this Book?
Because the book of Revelations makes it clear that the one world government will be formed by financial means.
And it causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark on their right hand, or in their foreheads, even that not any might buy or sell except those having the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of its name. (Rev. 13:16 & 17)
This is how Satan through the rich has been forming his one world government. The United States was not formed to protect the people. All the states were sovereign and independent already. They agreed to come under a federal government for economic benefits, just as the European Union has attempted to do the same. Continue reading “America’s 60 Families” »
September 05, 2014 by
The danger of self righteousness.
(Mat 23:15) A curse is on you, scribes and Pharisees, false ones! for you go about land and sea to get one disciple and, having him, you make him twice as much a son of hell as yourselves.
A reader of an old article written by another author that I posted had been trying to get me to remove the article. He has a website of his own dedicated to discrediting the author of the article. My initial response pointed out that even if the messenger had faults, the message was still valid. You can read the comments posted back and forth there so I will not repeat them here. In my final comment to him I shared the verse where God hates those who sow discord amongst the brethren (Prov. 6:16) and as an American I found his attempt to censor free speech to be repugnant. His last comment which I did not post stated that the author had admitted to fraudulent credentials and that he found my refusal to remove the article to be repugnant.
This post is not intended as an attack on the reader. He has the right to his views, and I allowed him to share his views on my forum. I say my forum because I pay for this website and do not solicit any money from anyone. That gives me the right to choose who I allow to post comments. He has his own website on which he voices his opinions, so the free market of ideas flourishes. Instead I am using this as a launchpad to discuss how self righteousness is encouraged by organized religion. In reviewing past posts, I am see that this is an issue I have not addressed. Continue reading “Twice the Child of Hell” »
August 03, 2014 by
Feelings are not the same thing as spirituality.
In my last post, I said, “Love is an act of our will, not an emotion. Emotions are expressions of that act.” It seems to me that further explanation is merited. It took many years for me to understand the differences between soul and spirit – emotions are considered part of the soul – and to see how the two worked together is not easy.
The author of Hebrews said,
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Heb 4:12
The implication being that only the Word can tell the difference. How, then, can we tell the difference? The Scriptures gives us several clues. Consider what Jesus said about his own words. Continue reading “Spirituality is Not Emotionalism” »
July 14, 2014 by
Christians have lost sight of the truth through shallow living.
My marriage was an arranged marriage. I was too shallow to recognize an appropriate spouse. My arrangement was not made by my parents, however. I was 38 when I met my wife. The arrangement was by God. The Lord needed to break through my shallow thinking. Before I met my wife I either looked at how beautiful the girl was or whether she could be a business partner in marriage. A few months before meeting my wife I was sitting at a Christ for the Nations Marriage Conference. While listening, God dropped into my spirit the realization that Adam was being tested to see into the spirit when he named the animals. The Lord was testing Adam to see if he could see beyond the flesh. The names he spoke were not names he made up, but were the names spoken by God Himself. Because Adam passed the test, the Lord put him to sleep and created Eve from his side. She looked nothing like him, yet he saw in the spirit and said “bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” (Gen. 2:23).
The second day after meeting my wife, the Lord spoke to me and said, “This is it.” And I knew that she was bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh. I knew she was my soul mate and had a peace and comfort in her presence that I never had with any other person in my life. When the Lord spoke to me, I thought to myself, “But I don’t love her.” The Lord responded to my spirit and told me that I would learn to love her as Isaac had learned to love Rebecca. I love my wife now more than I have ever experienced a love for someone, even though it did not happen automatically and I had a major disappointment in not being able to have children that almost ruined my marriage. That disappointment was overcome by my knowing that she was God’s will for me, therefore I chose to love her through the trial. Love is an act of our will, not an emotion. Emotions are expressions of that act. Continue reading “The Case for Arranged Marriages” »
July 04, 2014 by
Being a patriot is not equal to being a Christian.
On this 4th of July we are all called to rally around the flag. I love the flag in that I believe that it is a beautiful banner, and I hang mine up outside my home. I also love the virtues of American past and present that is found in many of its people.
Before I experienced the new birth I had an upbringing disdaining authorities rooted in the 1960’s hippie movement. At the age of 32 Christ revealed Himself to me and began a process of reversing my thinking. I became a Republican and sought to influence the political process through my votes and activism. But after closely following the Clinton and Bush administrations I saw that there was no difference between the parties, and that voting was a sham. I questioned the church being such a big sponsor of the Republican party, and after 20 years of following the church party line, I realized that it is still the same world system. American Christians have lost sight of the gospel because of conservative talk radio. Continue reading “Christian Patriotism is Misplaced” »
June 06, 2014 by
A year has passed since the revelation of Ed Snowden, who worked for the NSA, that all Americans were being spied upon and data-based by the US government. Surprisingly, many American Christians seemed unconcerned. Their mindset is that we are doing nothing wrong so we don’t need to be concerned. American Christians, in general, seem to be unaware of history. This ignorance is supported by organized religion that has made many believers think that we are to blindly obey anything the government does as though the government were in God’s stead.
History shows that all governments are contrary to God. More people die at the hands of their own governments than from other governments according to RJ Rummel. Jesus was crucified by trumped up charges created by the “ruling class” of Pharisees and Sadducees who persuaded Pilot, from the Roman government, to have him crucified. If Nero had the surveillance technology of today, there would be no Christian church that would have survived his persecutions. I speak in hyperbole because nothing will thwart the Lord’s preservation of His church (that is, true born again disciples of Christ) just as the Bible has never been destroyed.
However, that does not mean we should idly stand by and let the surveillance increase. We need to be proactive in protecting our privacy. And this is what Reset the Net is all about. Please go to their website and read what they have to say.
May 24, 2014 by
We are all called to personal responsibility to God and life.
Living according to the will of God in His Kingdom has never changed. It began with Adam and Eve, was lived by the patriarchs, exemplified in the book of Judges, was codified in the Mosaic Covenant, and revealed in the heart of God through the cross of Calvary. In short it is taking personal responsibility for our lives and others.
In the garden of Eden, instead of taking personal responsibility for their actions, our parents, Adam and Eve tried to pass the buck. I wonder what would have happened if they both admitted their error and accepted responsibility for their unbelief and disobedience? Knowing Jesus Christ I believe He would have forgiven them, even though they would still suffer the consequence of their actions. Is it possible that consequence would have stopped with them and the rest of the world been spared? Only God knows. Ezekiel declared that the sins of the fathers would not be passed onto the sons.
(Eze 18:20) The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
I knew a messianic Jew who once speculated that if Adam had not participated in eating the forbidden fruit, he would have remained sinless and could have laid his life down for Eve as Christ has done for the Church. Of course, if he had the sense not to eat the fruit, you would think he would have stopped Eve from eating the fruit in the first place. Regardless of the speculation, we know that they avoided their personal responsibility and played the blame game, passing the buck ultimately to God Himself since it was He who gave Adam the woman (Gen. 3:13). Continue reading “The Kingdom Means Personal Responsibility” »